Which method is NOT used for identifying potential hazards?

The method of random guessing is not a valid or effective approach for identifying potential hazards. In a professional setting, identifying hazards relies on systematic and methodical techniques that ensure safety and compliance with regulatory standards.

Consultation involves engaging with team members or experts to gather insights and experiences regarding possible hazards in a specific environment. Inspection entails a thorough examination of the workspace to detect hazards, assessing the physical conditions, equipment, and overall safety protocols in place. Job Task Analysis involves evaluating specific tasks to identify inherent risks associated with those activities, allowing for targeted hazard assessments and the implementation of appropriate safety measures.

In contrast, random guessing lacks any structured methodology and does not provide a reliable means to uncover potential hazards, leading to increased risks and unsafe working conditions. Thus, it stands apart from the other methods, which are grounded in data, experience, and systematic evaluation.